Talk:Leap2020
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article seems to have been written by a member of the Leap2020 staff (the use of '<< >>' gives it away). I thought articles on Wikipedia have to be written by an independent person not involved with the organisation being discussed? Interesting....
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I agree : this article doesn't seem very balanced. Last time I stumble upon some of LEAP's work, they were announcing the end of the world for the next 6 months. We're still waiting, it was a few years ago. This article should be handle with care until some more work is put on it. 130.223.75.54 (talk) 13:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Clearly this article is unbalanced and improperly unreferenced. For example, the Manual of Political Anticipation, which is supposed to underpin their objectivity is a link to the editor of the Manual of Political Anticipation. McKidd (talk) 20:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
It seems now that their staff have removed the use of '<< >>' in this wikipedia article. Interesting again..... ā Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.134.254 (talk) 02:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)