Grant v Australian Knitting Mills
Judgement of the High Court of Australia / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Grant v Australian Knitting Mills?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills[1] is a landmark case in consumer and negligence law from 1935, holding that where a manufacturer knows that a consumer may be injured if the manufacturer does not take reasonable care, the manufacturer owes a duty to the consumer to take that reasonable care. It continues to be cited as an authority in legal cases,[2] and used as an example for students studying law.[3]
Quick Facts Australian Knitting Mills Limited v Grant, Court ...
Australian Knitting Mills Limited v Grant | |
---|---|
Court | High Court of Australia |
Full case name | Australian Knitting Mills Ltd and John Martin & Co v Grant |
Decided | 18 August 1933 |
Citation(s) | [1933] HCA 35, (1933) 50 CLR 387 |
Case history | |
Prior action(s) | Grant v John Martin & Co and Australian Knitting Mills Limited [1933] SAStRp 3, [1935] SASR 457 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Starke, Dixon, Evatt and McTiernan JJ |
Close
Quick Facts Grant v Australian Knitting Mills, Court ...
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills | |
---|---|
Court | Privy Council |
Decided | 21 October 1935 |
Citation(s) | [1935] UKPC 62, [1936] AC 85; [1935] UKPCHCA 1, (1935) 54 CLR 49 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Viscount Hailsham LC, Lord Blanesburgh, Lord Macmillan, Lord Wright Sir Lancelot Sanderson |
Close