Konstantin Pobedonostsev
19th-century Russian statesman, jurist, and advisor to the Tsar / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Konstantin Pobedonostsev?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev (Russian: Константи́н Петро́вич Победоно́сцев, IPA: [kənstɐnʲˈtʲin pʲɪˈtrovʲɪtɕ pəbʲɪdɐˈnostsɨf]; 30 November 1827[1] – 23 March 1907) was a Russian jurist and statesman who served as an adviser to three Russian emperors. During the reign of Alexander III of Russia, Pobedonostsev was considered the chief spokesman for reactionary positions and the éminence grise of imperial politics. Between 1880 and 1905, he served as Ober-Procurator of the Most Holy Synod,[2] making him the non-clerical Russian official who supervised the Russian Orthodox Church.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Russian. (March 2023) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Konstantin Pobedonostsev | |
---|---|
Ober-Procurator of the Most Holy Synod | |
In office 24 April 1880 – 19 October 1905 | |
Monarchs | |
Preceded by | Dmitry Tolstoy |
Succeeded by | Aleksei Obolenskiy [ru] |
Personal details | |
Born | Konstantin Petrovich Pobedonostsev (1827-11-30)30 November 1827 Moscow, Moscow Governorate, Russian Empire |
Died | (1907-03-23)23 March 1907 (aged 79) Saint Petersburg, Russian Empire |
Nationality | Russian |
Alma mater | Imperial School of Jurisprudence |
Occupation | Jurist, teacher |
His writings on politics, law, art, and culture emphasized the positive element of the spiritual and secular unification of Russia with the acceptance of Christianity, while simultaneously condemning the Jewish population. He warned of the negative element in Russia, portraying democratic and liberal movements as enemies of the national and religious unity of the Russian people. He opined that the task of achieving a harmonious society meant there was a collective responsibility to uphold political and religious unity, which justified the close supervision of Russian behaviour and thinking as a necessity.[3]