Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn
2010 ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada (2010 SCC 39) / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Quebec (Attorney General) v. Canadian Owners and Pilots Association, 2010 SCC 39, [2010] 2 SCR 536, also referred to as Quebec v. COPA, is a leading case of the Supreme Court of Canada on determining the applicability of the doctrines of interjurisdictional immunity and federal paramountcy in Canadian constitutional law.
Quick Facts Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn, Hearing: October 14, 2009 Judgment: October 15, 2010 ...
Quebec (AG) v Canadian Owners and Pilots Assn | |
---|---|
Hearing: October 14, 2009 Judgment: October 15, 2010 | |
Full case name | Attorney General of Quebec v Canadian Owners and Pilots Association |
Citations | 2010 SCC 39 (CanLII), [2010] 2 SCR 536 |
Docket No. | 32604 [1] |
Prior history | Appealed from Laferrière c. Québec (Procureur général), 2008 QCCA 427 (CanLII), 48 M.P.L.R. (4th) 26, [2008] Q.J. No. 1597 (QL), 2008 CarswellQue 14277, reversing a decision of the Superior Court, Laferrière c. Lortie 2006 QCCS 3377 (CanLII), [2006] J.Q. no 5998 (QL), 2006 CarswellQue 5622, upholding a decision of the Court of Québec, Laferrière c. Québec (Commission de protection du territoire agricole) 2002 CanLII 41590 (QC CQ), [2002] J.Q. no 4771 (QL). |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin Puisne Justices: Ian Binnie, Louis LeBel, Marie Deschamps, Morris Fish, Rosalie Abella, Louise Charron, Marshall Rothstein, Thomas Cromwell | |
Reasons given | |
Majority | McLachlin C.J. |
Dissent | Deschamps J., joined by LeBel J. |
Close