User-reported
- Non-free image deletion machine 3000 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think this is pretending to be a bot, but with a compliant username. Secretlondon (talk) 11:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've put a template on their page as we need to do that before an RFC. I think we should probably treat this like a -bot, but want agreement first. Secretlondon (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I feel treating it like a -bot is fine in this case, but at this point we can wait to see if they're willing to just change their name. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia needs to make better account creation website (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 04:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Wait until the user edits. 331dot (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think they are also User:I would be bias if it was allowed. Secretlondon (talk) 11:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- BanerjeeDigital (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See User:BanerjeeDigital. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: look at text in original, deleted version of user page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:37, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Banerjee is their real name. I don't think the name is block worthy. PhilKnight (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Requests for permissions
Rollback
Hello! I revert vandalism quite frequently and I would like rollback rights so I can use the AntiVandal tool to make the process faster. CGP05 (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 06:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I try to warn the majority of editors that vandalize. I will ensure that I warn every time from now on. CGP05 (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. I note that again, you've failed to notify an editor post revert even after you promised to do so yesterday. Anyways, upon further review, I'm not seeing enough consistent counter-vandalism work to determine whether you'll be able to use the tool appropriately. I also see that you've made a total of zero reports to AIV, which is an important stop for any serious counter-vandalism patroller. Please review my feedback, and if you're still interested in the tool, then please spend at least a month actively patrolling before reapplying. As such, closing as Not done -Fastily 06:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you a lot for the feedback and I will take it into account before reapplying. CGP05 (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
I would like to add another tool to my antivandalism toolbelt. I already use Twinkle and make a point to warn most if not vandals. This has resulted in a lower reoccurrence rate and helps the wiki. I will use the tool to assist in these efforts. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 16:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Not done I noticed you started actively reverting vandalism about 2 weeks ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend more time gaining experience fighting vandalism before assigning you advanced permissions. Keep up the good work, and consider reapplying in a month. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits (I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which makes this extremely easy). Thanks, Fastily 19:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
|