User talk:Rukkiet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Here's the way it looks to me...
- Rukkiet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Disruptive editing
Decline reason: You are now directly blocked because of your abuse of multiple accounts to continue your disruptive editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Rukkiet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my single account. I have connect internet from my university Boing! said Zebedee please unblock me now!!
Decline reason:
You post an unblock request in which you claim that you have not used any other accounts, and when you are presented with evidence showing that you have, you admit that you did so in order to hide what you were doing from other editors, and you think that is a reason to be unblocked??? Consider yourself lucky that I have decided not to block you indefinitely, since you have made it clear that you are not to be trusted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You created a number of unusual templates, containing content taken from Wikipedia articles, and when they were nominated for deletion you blanked them. One example is Template:2017 Chang FA Cup (I have since deleted them in accordance with WP:G7 but admins can still see them). At about the same time, User:RKC36 started creating exactly the same kind of templates (eg Template:2017 Chang FA Cup C1), and was blocked. And then User:RKC37 was created, and immediately started creating exactly the same kind of templates (eg Template:2017 T3 Lower C2). All of these accounts appear to be operating from the same IP address or address range (I can't see those IP addresses as I do not have sufficient access rights, but the IP unblock appeals make it clear). Can you explain all of this? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:42, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Boing! said Zebedee I create the template to draft my updating and send all of data to main article. What can I do now.
- What you can do now is explain the connection between those three accounts. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Boing! said Zebedee(talk) All is my new account but I created all of them to help unblock my drafting page. Unblock me!! There are many Thai football page that I must to update now. Results of 2017 SCG Muangthong United F.C. season 2017 Bangkok United F.C. season 2017 Chonburi F.C. season 2017 Ratchaburi Mitr Phol F.C. season 2017 Sukhothai F.C. season 2017 Chiangrai United F.C. season 2017 Police Tero F.C. season 2017 Suphanburi F.C. season still not updated. If you still block me, all of these will not updated.
- When your edits are contested, is is not acceptable to blank them and continue doing them from another account. In order to be unblocked, we would need an unblock request that explains what you were doing and why you were apparently trying to evade scrutiny by using different accounts, and which convinces a reviewing admin that you will stop your problematic behaviour and will discuss things and try to reach a consensus instead. And those strange large templates you were creating by copying content from existing articles are certainly unconventional, and they would need explanation and consensus. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
- Boing! said Zebedee(talk) I do that because I need to hide my drafted template from public to prevent confusion if someone is involved my drafting. You understand, don't you? I have improve many article about Thai Football League for long time such as results, statistics, developments, references, and etc. I am an expert abut all Thai football system. My editing is always reliable. I have up loaded official logo of Thai football league such T1, T2, T3, and T4 with sponsored. I have a lot of grace with articles about Thai football. You have better ways if I need to draft my site before add it to public articles, haven't you? Before edit public articles I must to drafting it to check any mistake. In my draft, I need privacy. Update data about Thai football is my happiness but it had broken down by your blocking. Many Thai football articles waiting for me.
- When your edits are contested, is is not acceptable to blank them and continue doing them from another account. In order to be unblocked, we would need an unblock request that explains what you were doing and why you were apparently trying to evade scrutiny by using different accounts, and which convinces a reviewing admin that you will stop your problematic behaviour and will discuss things and try to reach a consensus instead. And those strange large templates you were creating by copying content from existing articles are certainly unconventional, and they would need explanation and consensus. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)