Discussion utilisateur:Looxix/archive-20040227
De Wikipedia, l'encyclopédie encyclopedia
Some people think that 2 opposing sides can battle it out, and let the best man win.
A sort of zero-sum game.
But I don't think Wikipedia can work like that.
Balance can't come without stability.
A stable article is one which any side in a controversy can look at and
say, yes, this article describes my side accurately and does not give
an unfair advantage to the other side.
Sometimes I want to propose a rule that, when someone goes on a POV crusade,
they should be told not to edit any more until they can
"state the other side's case to the satisfaction of the other side"
(to paraphrase famous success coach Steven Covey).
Ed Poor