Cooper v Hobart
Supreme Court of Canada case / From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dear Wikiwand AI, let's keep it short by simply answering these key questions:
Can you list the top facts and stats about Cooper v Hobart?
Summarize this article for a 10 year old
SHOW ALL QUESTIONS
Cooper v Hobart, 2001 SCC 79 is a Supreme Court of Canada case that redefined the "Anns test", which was adopted in Kamloops (City of) v Nielsen to establish a duty of care in civil tort cases.
Quick Facts Cooper v Hobart, Hearing: June 20, 2001 Judgment: November 16, 2001 ...
Cooper v Hobart | |
---|---|
Hearing: June 20, 2001 Judgment: November 16, 2001 | |
Full case name | Mary Francis Cooper v. Robert J. Hobart and Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of British Columbia |
Citations | 2001 SCC 79, [2001] 3 SCR 537 |
Docket No. | 27880 [1] |
Ruling | Appeal dismissed |
Holding | |
A Registrar does not owe a duty of care to investors | |
Court membership | |
Chief Justice: Beverley McLachlin Puisne Justices: Claire L'Heureux-Dubé, Charles Gonthier, Frank Iacobucci, John C. Major, Michel Bastarache, Ian Binnie, Louise Arbour, Louis LeBel | |
Reasons given | |
Unanimous reasons by | McLachlin CJ and Major J |
L'Heureux-Dubé and Iacobucci JJ took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Close