Saxe v. State College Area School District
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Saxe v. State College Area School District, 240 F.3d 200 (3d Cir. 2001), was a case decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that ruled that the State College Area School District's policy restricting "unwelcome" and "offensive" speech on public school grounds violates the First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause.[1][2]
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
Quick Facts Saxe v. State College Area School District, Court ...
Saxe v. State College Area School District | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit |
Full case name | David Warren Saxe; Student Doe 1, by and through his next friend, David Warren Saxe; Student Doe 2, by and through his next friend, David Warren Saxe, Appellants v. State College Area School District; Constance Martin, in her official capacity as President of the State College Area School District |
Argued | May 23, 2000 |
Decided | February 14, 2001 |
Citation(s) | 240 F.3d 200 |
Court membership | |
Judge(s) sitting | Samuel Alito, Marjorie O. Rendell, John Malcolm Duhé, Jr. (5th Cir.) |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Alito, joined by Duhé |
Concurrence | Rendell |
Close